Wikia

Adventure Time with Finn and Jake Wiki

Tavisource

aka Tavis

Wikia Star Founder
2,762 Edits since joining this wiki
May 21, 2009
  • I live in California
  • I was born on May 1
  • My occupation is Community Manager, Consultant, Web Developer, Design and UX Manager
  • I am Male
77.75.77.32
  Loading editor
  • i want to be administrator.

      Loading editor
    • Considering you've only done 6 edits in the course of over 2 years, I'm not sure you're ready to be at the rank of an administrator. Don't take this personally, but you'll have to make more edits to pages before becoming an admin. Take Flambo the Epic Epic(; for instance, he has done over 12,000 edits since 2012! Even take me for example, I've been here about 3 months now and already have 100 edits. In conclusion, you're just not ready but that's just my opinion.

        Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
  • Somebody put in Bubblegum Princess trivia and Marceline trivia they are couple and that never be confirmed or denied by Pen Ward.

    Please help me, because I feel i will be blocked or banned of this wikia for that reason.  

      Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
  • YOU ARE AWESOME!

      Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
  • Dear Tavisource,

    I am a YouTuber who makes costume Lego creations, reviews and other Lego related videos. Here is a link to my channel: https://www.youtube.com/user/varyspeterfilms
    Recently I created a Finn figurine with all of his main swords (from 'Scarlet' to 'Finn Sword'), and I'd like to show images of the swords from the cartoon in the review video. 
    Since this wikipedia has the best images, I would like to use them and show them in my video.
    Please tell me if this is okay with You and the wikipedia's policy.
    

    Sincerely, Varys Peter

      Loading editor
  • Can you respond on the wiki chat please?

      Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
  • Hey I just wanna say, its super awesome that you're the admin of the AT wiki and it looks lovely and its always really interesting and clean! I'm not sure if you have any sway or even noticed it, but you really don't need to keep giving Jake the epithet of "finn's adoptive brother". I'm adopted and have siblings and they're "my siblings". seeing as finn doesn't struggle with any kind of familial identity issues and even considers Joshua more of a father than Martin, I think it wouldn't be a bad idea to just keep refering to jake as Jake in Finn's bio.

    also just fyi, thisi sn't a complaint and i'm not offended- I don't think anyone would be, its just a suggestion! Thanks for listening!

      Loading editor
  • Just simply by looking at your page your history is amazing! Admin at 4 wikis and founder of 2 of them! Going deeper it is possible to see your past. Nearly 3,000 AT edits and nearly 7 and a half thousand edits overall!

    I'm sure your story would an inspiration to all Wiki Founders, Crats, Admins, Mods and editors alike. Would you please share with us your story, from that first Thursday, late May 2009 (or earlier if you want) to today's events (A job as a design and UX manager?)

    yeah you don't actually have to do this but please? (probably best to put it into a blogpost, but you already know that)

      Loading editor
  • When multiple model sheets for the same character give different names, should we go by the most recent one? I ask because Starchie/Starchy has two different sheets. This isn't covered in the MoS.

      Loading editor
    • He's a special case. Yeah, in that case you would just go with whatever he's labeled as in the credits. If there's no way to tell which one is correct, just go with the newest one and redirect the other.

        Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
  • Not sure if this has been brought to your attention yet, but…

    http://new.spring.me/#!/r/regarding-root-beer-guy-is/680103460770698588

    Not really sure what your policy is regarding word of god, but I think you and the other admins should probably take this into consideration.

      Loading editor
    • View all 13 replies
    • You were banned temporarily for "ignoring the rules, ignoring people telling them about the rules, and for edit warring." That is so fair.

        Loading editor
    • Actually, it was just edit warring and I didn't know we were supposed to follow modelsheets back then. Plus, I don't think very nicely of people who undo my revisions, so I may ignore them due to that. That's ,my side of the story.

        Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
  • Hello there! Just needed to talk about a few things from the star wiki.

    I noticed that you gave rollback rights to someone. While this person has made quite a few edits, a chunk of their edits came from adding multiples of the same video and constantly doing and undoing an minor edit on an article. Also, I know this person kept asking to be an admin, but they haven't been around very long. I feel like it was a bit too soon and the person shouldn't have been doing those things to pull up their edit count, but I understand if you want the person to be a rollback.

    Maybe I'm just lost, but I think we need to figure out a system like the rules and how the wiki staff system will work. It'd be helpful for users and nice to have set rules in use.

    Thank you! :)

      Loading editor
    • Hey. Yeah. Rollback rights are reversible. It's more like a teaser to get users to contribute more, in a sense. I mean, if he/she doesn't do well with the rights, we'll just revoke it. Haha but to be honest, I didn't really look into the quality of his/her edits. That's my bad. However, it is true he/she has been here longer than most people. Apparently he/she created a new account.

        Loading editor
    • Also, at some point, if it's okay with you, is it possible that I can be promoted to bureaucrat? I mean it in no way to take full power or undermine you as the founder of the wiki, but as I'm consistantly on the wiki, I'd be able to pay attention to people on the wiki and promote them if I feel there are roles that need filled (and I'm not thinking of trying to chose by myself; a system for the wiki members to decide on members is important once there's enough members).

      I completely understand if this is turned down, but I just wanted to let you know. Thank you! :)

        Loading editor
    • You're at 657 Main Space edits right now but I'll grant you the rights. Is there someone in particular you wanted to promote at this time? (Please not Crossover). I guess we've been trying to implement the voting system we put up on AT wiki, over here. Accordingly, you would require 2 crat votes to be allowed a promotion. Promotion to Admin require 2 admin votes as well as at least 10 regular votes and no more than 3-5 oppositions. Something like that, don't remember exactly.

        Loading editor
    • We're not quite ready for another admin yet (ATG and I are a good amount for now until the wiki becomes larger), but both Dlrgirl75 and ImperfectXIII have been very diligent, commited, and hardworking on the wiki that I'd like to give them both rollback rights. Crossovers hasn't been on enough or done enough edits, so I wouldn't promote him.

      That's a good idea for the promotion system. I'd say adding a limit to how many people can be promoted to a particular role would be good, too, so that there won't be so many people promoted. It's a small wiki right now, so it's better to grow slowly as more people come around. I'll ask others on the wiki for thoughts and figure out a set system.

      Thank you so much for the promotion! I will be wise with what I do with it. :)

        Loading editor
    • 77.75.77.32
        Loading editor
See archived talk page
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message

Around Wikia's network

Random Wiki